Philo of Alexandria (c.20 BC – c. 50) - Jewish master of allegoryBut
the better way of understanding this passage is the following : God is
alone : a single being : not a combination : a single nature : but each
of us, and every other animal in the world, are compound beings : for
instance, I myself am made up of many things, of soul and body. Again,
the soul is made up of a rational part and an irrational part : also of
the body, there is one part hot, another cold ; one heavy, another
light ; one dry, another moist. But God is not a compound being, nor
one which is made up of many parts, but one which has no mixture with
anything else ; for whatever could be combined with God must be either
superior to him, or inferior to him, or equal to him. But there is
nothing equal to God, and nothing superior to him, and nothing is
combined with him which is worse than himself; for if it were, he
himself would be deteriorated ; and if he were to suffer deterioration,
he would also become perishable, which it is impious even to imagine.
Therefore God exists according to oneness and unity ; or we should
rather say, that oneness exists according to the one God, for all
number is more recent than the world, as is also time. But God is older
than the world, and is its Creator.
(
On the allegories of the sacred laws. Second book)
But
those who enter into agreements and alliances with the body, being
unable to throw off the robes of the flesh, and to behold that nature,
which alone of all natures has no need of anything, but is sufficient
for itself, and simple, and unalloyed, and incapable of being compared
with anything else, from the
same notions of the cause of all
things that they do of themselves ; not considering that in the case of
a being who exists through a concurrence of many faculties, he has need
of many parts in order to supply the necessities of each of those
faculties. (
On the unchangeableness of God, XI)
...there
are two principal positions laid down with respect to the great cause
of all things : one, that God is not as a man ; the other, that God is
as a man. But the first of these assertions is confirmed by the most
certain truth, while the latter is introduced for the instruction of
the many. In reference to which, it is said concerning them, " as a man
would instruct his son." And this is said for the sake of instruction
and admonition, and not because he is really such by nature. (
On the unchangeableness of God, XI)